PREVIOUS ISSUES | WEB LINKS PAGE | READER'S COMMENTS | BACK TO FLAME HOME |INDEX OF ISSUES 1-18

Co-editors: Seán Mac Mathúna • John Heathcote
Consulting editor: Themistocles Hoetis
Field Correspondent: Allen Hougland

editors@fantompowa.info

 

Welcome to Blair's WorkCamp Britain

Welcome back to Flame - over a year since our last complete issue. Sometimes life gets in the way of writing. We also have to admit to an overwhelming amount of information concerning the current geopolitical situation to process . . .

I think there is a danger. I don't think people have woken up to what lies behind this. It allows the Government . . . to build up quite a comprehensive picture about many of your activities.

Richard Thomas, Information Comissioner, on the plans for the biometric ID card (The Guardian Aug 16th 2004)

The Information Commisioner appointed by the British Government, Richard Thomas, told The Times that he feared that Britain was 'sleepwalking into a Stasi state', and recalled the dark days of Spain under Franco.

He was commenting on Government plans to extend the databases collecting information on British citizens, and the Home Secretary, David Blunkett's 'secretive and uncosted plans' for the biometric identity card scheme. Information contained on the id card would extend to five foolscap pages of print; would be available to most Government departments and security services; but would be unavailable to the individual concerned.

Two other projects being promoted by this Government, who came to power promising 'open Government' and respect for the rights of the individual (not just the bourgeosie in their gated communities and leafy suburbs) are the "Citizens Information Project", which is a population 'register', and a database covering every child from the moment they leave the womb to the age of eighteen.

The Commons Home Affairs select committee has already warned that the ID card scheme would completely alter the relationship that exists between the individual and the State.

 

Since the 2000 Bush election, all of the 'conspiracy theories' and leftfield political analyses have proved to be too repressed, naive , even mundane.

The current US Administration, with its poodle client-regime in Britain, have superceded perhaps the worst fears of any on the old political Left. Their brazen pursuit of global economic and military dominance has been effected through the use of a 'strategy of tension' to control their own populations; restrictions on speech, thought and movement of populations worldwide; the assassination of political and social leaders around the world; the support of governments using state terrorism, torture, kidnapping and indefinite detention without trial.

At the same time, we are told that these measures are being taken to preserve the cherished freedoms of the "Christian" - or "secular" West; to open up the world to "free trade"; to safeguard the populations of the US - Anglo alliance.

In reality, we who live in these countries lost any real freedoms a long time ago.

We live in surveillance cultures, where only the super-rich have any right to privacy, freedom of movement, justice.

Workers in the UK now have less rights now than at any time since the 1940's; the unions only having had any power in the three decades following the Second World War.

Before that, feudalism was replaced by industrial slavery, for folk already dispossessed of their meagre subsistence holdings by the 'Agricultural Revolution'. The forge of modern capitalism was named 'The industrial Revolution'. It says something about a country that the only Revolutions we have had since 1645 have been ones that made the rich richer, and the poor poorer - and this in the land of Robin Hood.

Our Prime Minister is seen around the World, glad-handing for arms dealers; excusing the imperial militarism of his friends in Washington, and prattling on about liberty, justice and terrorism; unaware that his blatant hypocrisy and own lack of personal credibility undermines every word he says,

In the previous editorial, written on the eve of war in Iraq, I forecast that Blair was finished as a Labour leader, and Prime Minister.

I still believe that is true; but as in the US, democracy is now a tightly restricted club.Our leaders are chosen; and the choice no longer has to do with popular movement, because there is no really cohesive 'active' society in these respective countries. Fragmentation of the different elements of the greater community have been riven by the cult of individualism and the paranoias which are pumped out of the media, primarily through television, the new Universal Sea of the Subconscious.

Most newspapers are owned by foreign conglomerates, and it was the decisive pressure of US shareholders, unhappy with The Mirror's stance as the only consistently anti-war tabloid, that ultimately led to the resignation of editor Piers Morgan.

Yet these papers are the very same that will decry the idea of Europe (while offering cheap holidays in Ibiza, or 'the chance to own a villa in Tuscany' to their readers).They will talk of the 'hordes' flooding in from the countries of Eastern Europe, as if we have a better quality of life in the UK than anywhere else; whereas the truth is that only Albania and Romania are perhaps as desperate and stressful as the inner cities of Britain. The allegiance of most newspaper owners, with Murdoch at their head , lies across the Atlantic, in that billionaires' paradise, the USA.

None of the tabloid newspapers saw fit to raise an outcry about the new Extradition arrangements between the US and UK, agreed by David Blunkett in Febuary 2004, under which the United States has the right to extradite UK citizens without presenting any evidence that they have been guilty of a crime. When a country gives up the right to protect its own citizens against unfair imprisonment and trial, it has already surrendered its sovereignty in the most elemental way.

The country is controlled by a handful of supermarket barons and faceless corporate monopolists, working hand-in-hand with a hereditary class of 'mandarins' and landowners. Lawyers and middle-management types run the country for them under the nom de guerre of 'New Labour' (previously the SDP); and their friends from the public (eg.exclusive) schools are awarded the money from the sale of public assets to advertise, promote and spin 'lifestyle', consumer tat and spurious political cons.

Behind them are the dark shadows of unaccountable 'security agencies' and spies; with police vehicles more visible than the London Bus in many parts of the capital; CCTV cameras on every corner, swivelling to watch your progress down every road or footpath.

'State theatre' and 'intelligence-led' rumours are used to justify every further depletion of your personal liberty (as in the recent "Manchester-Liverpool Football bomb plot'), and the police are given carte blanche by an unprincipled Government of bougeois liberals to extend their powers and activities beyond anything justified by the tragedy of 911 .

But like most heavens dreamt up for the exclusive few, the United States has a greater disparity between the rich and poor, even in the capital city, than any other country in the Western world.

It was as much the unquestioning support of papers like the Sun; as well as the 'intelligence' scare stories repeated in tabloid, broadsheet and TV as much as the emotive rabble-rousing and crusading by duplicitous politicians, which drove the British people into the welcoming arms of Uncle Sam's Imperial Agenda and our involvement in a war which is not nearly over.

This happened despite some of the largest demonstrations ever taking place in Britain (and elsewhere in Western Europe), ignored by the British Government, amongst others. Is it any wonder that people are disillusioned with 'democratic' politics, and have given up any hope of change being affected by peaceful means?

 

 

 

PREVIOUS ISSUES | WEB LINKS PAGE | READER'S COMMENTS | BACK TO FLAME HOME |INDEX OF ISSUES 1-18